CCTV News:On June 1st, the 14th Academician Conference of China Academy of Engineering closed in Beijing. The conference announced the list of the new leadership of China Academy of Engineering. Academician Li Xiaohong, 59, was elected as the new president after the election of the Academician Conference.

　　Li Xiaohong, Dean of China Academy of Engineering (data map)

　　As the fifth president of China Academy of Engineering after Zhu Guangya, Song Jian, Xu Kuangdi and Zhou Ji,Li Xiaohong, who is under 60, has also become the youngest dean of China Academy of Engineering.

　　At the closing ceremony of the Academician Conference, Li Xiaohong said that he felt a great responsibility. He had to do his utmost to be a grounded, service-oriented and qualified president of China Academy of Engineering with the spirit of "I don’t have to succeed" and the responsibility of "I must succeed".

　　According to media reports, Li Xiaohong has been committed to the research on water jet technology and its application in coal mine safety engineering for a long time, and has made many important research achievements in coalbed methane mining and gas disaster prevention in complex coal mines.

　　As the chief scientist of the "973 Project", Li Xiaohong is now working on the research of enhancing shale gas exploitation with supercritical carbon dioxide.

　　It is not difficult to find out from Li Xiaohong’s resume that Li Xiaohong worked in colleges and universities for a long time and served as president twice: in February 2003, Li Xiaohong served as president of Chongqing University; In December 2010, Li Xiaohong served as President of Wuhan University, and until November 2016, he served as Vice Minister of Education.

　　Among them, during Li Xiaohong’s six years as principal,The world ranking of Wuhan University has risen by nearly 100 places, and the school has entered one of the best development periods in history.

　　When Li Xiaohong was the president of Wuhan University, he said: "We should promote the construction of world-class universities and first-class disciplines, build universities with outstanding spirit and build the most beautiful universities in China."

　　In order to achieve this goal, Wuhan University vigorously promoted the introduction of talents. In the first year of Li Xiaohong’s appointment as president, Wuhan University introduced 68 high-level talents; In December 2011, China Academy of Engineering and China Academy of Sciences successively announced the list of co-opted academicians in that year, and Wu Da added five academicians.

　　Not only that, Wuhan University has successively produced a number of "national name" platforms, such as the State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, the national high-end think tank of international law, and the national key Marxist Institute.

　　According to Changjiang Daily, when Li Xiaohong was interviewed by Sons of China magazine in 2013, Wu Da ranked around 400 universities in the world. Li Xiaohong said at that time that he hoped to be in the top 300 in 2015, and then in the top 200 in 2020, so as to be firmly in the first phalanx of China University.

　　In 2015, Wuhan University also entered the top 400 of the three world university rankings (USNews ranked 301st, QS ranked 335th, Times Higher Education ranked 352nd), ranking among the "G9 Group" of China University in the world.　

　　In 2016, Wuhan University ranked among the top 50 Asian universities in QS.

　　In addition to attaching importance to talent introduction and discipline construction,Li Xiaohong is also the male god "Brother Xiaohong" in the eyes of Wu Da students.

　　On the first day of school in September 2013, Li Xiaohong inspected the classroom (Source: official WeChat of Wuhan University)

　　The official WeChat of Wuhan University has published the original article "Principal’s Seal | Luo Xiao Lai Different Red". According to the article, since January 1, 2011, Xiao Hongge has often posted in the school forum to discuss the credit system tuition fees, how to hold graduation ceremonies and hold distinctive school celebrations with his classmates; Xiao Hongge sang songs with his classmates many times at school celebrations and New Year’s Eve parties. Please also invite the dragon boat team that lost the race to have a meal to cheer everyone up: "We will definitely win back next year!" ; On October 15th, 2016, the first collective wedding of Wuhan University alumni was held, and 123 pairs of Wuhan University alumni returned to their alma mater. Li Xiaohong married 123 couples, and the school also issued commemorative marriage certificates for the new couples.

　　In June 2016, Li Xiaohong took a group photo with the graduates (Source: official WeChat of Wuhan University)

　　At the opening ceremony and graduation ceremony, Brother Xiaohong was also witty. At the opening ceremony of the freshmen of Wuhan University in 2016, Li Xiaohong said to his classmates, "Students, I thought,Being CEO, marrying Bai Fumei, marrying Gao Fushuai and being a winner in life should never be the ultimate goal of life.I hope that you will learn to refuse ‘ Exquisite egoism ’ And ‘ Indifferent egoism ’ To become a person with lofty aspirations and noble conduct, as required by the talent training goal of Wuhan University, the students trained by Wuhan University "should strive to become national backbones and leaders with firm national spirit, broad international vision, strong sense of social responsibility and mission, sound personality, generous knowledge and comprehensive ability, and can lead the future social progress and civilized development! "(Text/Chen Xin)

With the coming of the May Day holiday, more and more new energy troops have joined the ranks of long-distance travel, but it is inevitable to replenish energy for long-distance travel, and the lower the energy consumption, the longer the battery life and the fewer times of recharging. Therefore, the lower the energy consumption and fuel consumption of new energy vehicles is also something that must be considered for long-distance travel, and it should be divided into two situations. Pure electric vehicles have low energy consumption and less charging times, which is not only convenient and fast, but also does not need to compete with others for charging guns at high speed. For hybrid vehicles, not only the city should save fuel, but also the high-speed vehicles should save fuel. After all, no one wants their "new energy vehicles" to consume more fuel than traditional fuel vehicles. Today, we will start with the energy consumption of various new energy vehicles and summarize the high-speed energy consumption performance of four types of new energy vehicles.

Pure electric vehicles are also divided into high and low energy consumption

High-speed working conditions are relatively high energy consumption for pure electric vehicles, so the battery life of many electric vehicles under high-speed working conditions will be discounted, and even the loss of some vehicles is more exaggerated, but pure electric vehicles are also divided into high and low energy consumption, so which electric vehicle is more energy-saving? First of all, there are models with advantages in algorithm and electronic control motor. Tesla is an electric vehicle with good high-speed energy consumption performance at present, mainly because its algorithm is excellent and the electronic control motor is advanced. Of course, many domestic models also perform well in this respect, so I won’t give an example one by one.

In addition, there are pure electric vehicles with gearboxes. At present, such electric vehicles are relatively rare. Typical representatives are Porsche taycan, Lotus Eletler+,SAIC MarvelR and Audi e-tronSportback. These vehicles are all high-end models, and they all adopt 2AT gearboxes, which can shift gears at high speed and reduce high-speed energy consumption. In addition, the high-speed energy consumption of new energy vehicles with light weight and low drag coefficient is also excellent.

Plug-in hybrid also has two poles.

At present, there are two technical routes for plug-in and hybrid vehicles in China, one is the E-CVT direct drive scheme headed by BYD, and the other is the multi-gear DHT scheme represented by Great Wall Geely. The high-speed energy consumption performance of these two schemes is also different. The faster the direct drive scheme is, the higher the energy consumption is, especially in the case of heavy vehicles, and the high-speed fuel consumption is much higher than that in urban areas. The more gears in the multi-gear DHT scheme, the lower the high-speed energy consumption, which is the difference between the two schemes.

Extended range hybrid high-speed fuel consumption is the highest

The extended-range hybrid has a simple structure, and the driving quality is almost the same as that of pure electric vehicles. However, due to the lack of direct-drive function, the energy consumption of extended-range vehicles under high-speed conditions is terrible, which is completely opposite to that of conventional fuel vehicles under high-speed conditions. Especially, some extended-range vehicles with relatively large vehicle weight, such as the ideal L series, can achieve high-speed fuel consumption of about 9L kilometers, even higher than that of fuel vehicles of the same size, comparable to some full-size SUVs with V8 engines. This is mainly because the engine does not participate in direct-drive and can only do its best.

Summary: At present, the energy consumption performance of most electric vehicles on the market at high speed is average, while the energy consumption performance of gearboxes in hybrid models is better than that of direct-drive models, while the extended-range models have the highest energy consumption at high speed, which is the least recommended for long-term high-speed use. Therefore, you should be clear about your own use needs and buy cars according to actual needs. (Text/Youshi Automobile Haoyang)

　　Recently, the discussion on the topic of "996 working system" has been heating up. The so-called "996 working system" means that employees arrive at work at 9: 00 a.m. every day and work until 9: 00 p.m., six days a week. From an Internet company’s public announcement at the annual meeting to the "996.ICU" protest initiated by programmers, and to the opinions expressed by many star entrepreneurs in recent days, this topic has become a social hot spot of concern to the whole people. The semi-monthly talk, which has the reputation of being the first magazine in China, has repeatedly commented on the 996 working system and analyzed it from different angles.

Talk about 996— — Keywords "illegal"

　　[Advocating the 996 working system, who gave "praise" the courage to openly violate the law? 】

　　At the company’s annual meeting in 2018, which was praised by e-commerce, executives announced on the spot that they would implement the 996 working system in the future, and even said that they could divorce if their work-family balance was not good, which not only made some employees feel dissatisfied, but also caused controversy. Praise CEO White Crow responded that it is definitely a good thing to look back this time a few years later, so that more people can understand the praise culture, and it will also make talents think carefully when they want to enter, so that they will not be different before and after coming.

　　Article 36 of China’s labor law: the state implements a working-hour system in which workers work no more than eight hours a day and no more than forty-four hours a week on average; Article 90 stipulates that if an employer violates the provisions of this law and extends the working hours of workers, the labor administrative department shall give a warning, order it to make corrections and may impose a fine.

　　According to the Youzan 996 working system, employees work up to 11.5 hours a day and work overtime for more than 100 hours a month, which obviously exceeds the working hours stipulated by the state. "Zanzan" made a big splash when it announced this illegal work system, and it was also justified when it responded. However, no matter whether "praise" wants to take the opportunity to lay off people or reduce wages in disguise, CEO regards illegality as a "good thing" and sublimates it into corporate culture. This is not only a problem of distorted values, but also a bad environment with high cost of safeguarding rights and low risk of illegality in the current labor market. Rights protection can’t rely solely on individuals, and relevant departments must "shoot when it’s time to shoot" according to law. At present, many enterprises are talking about the wolf nature. This desperate working mode, after putting on the coat of "struggle", has almost become a poisonous chicken soup for squeezing employees. I hope those companies that advocate the 996 working system and regard it as the standard understand that before talking about wolf nature, we must first talk about human nature. For those enterprises that deliberately ignore human nature and want to decorate the facade by one or two "family days", the relevant departments must be tough, give employees the confidence to defend their rights, and let the enterprises involved see the severity of the law.

Two Comments on Half-monthly Talks 996— — Keywords "overwork"

　　[Beware of the normalization of the "996" working system that gave birth to the "overworked generation"]

　　Nowadays, the trend of 996 working system spreading from internet companies to various industries is worrying. Many workers are trapped by this working system and forced to become "overworked generation" in endless overtime. This means that in the state that the 996 working system has become a hidden rule in the industry, even if you choose to change jobs, you still can’t get rid of the overtime curse. It is the workplace that changes and the working hours remain unchanged.

　　In fact, the 996 working system has been invisible for many years. However, it used to be covered with a layer of "flexible working system", but now it is openly declared as a normal working mode by some companies. Some companies use the so-called "struggle" to whitewash the 996 working system, and some companies use "high salary" to achieve a game with workers on the 996 working system. While the downward pressure on the economy is increasing, more companies normalize the 996 working system, while doing everything possible to reduce the overtime pay that workers deserve, so as to save costs and increase profits.

　　The social harm of 996 working system is self-evident, which overdraws the health and energy of workers, damages the interest and enthusiasm of a generation for work, and then has a negative impact on sustainable economic development and social harmony. Perhaps at present, the number of enterprises implementing the 996 working system has not reached the majority, but in the public opinion field with the magnifying effect of the Internet, the dissatisfaction caused by 996 is immeasurable to the society. A few days ago, an article "In my parents ‘ 996’ In front of us, the news that Japanese young people choose low desire has aroused people’s concern, and we should be alert to the hidden worries behind it.

　　In the face of the 996 working system, which is striding forward to normalization, the government labor department and the relevant institutions on which workers rely for safeguarding their rights cannot remain silent. After all, people work for a better life, not to give up their lives for work.

Three Comments on Half-monthly Talks 996— — Keywords "pseudo-struggle"

　　[996 has nothing to do with struggle, but with interests]

　　The discussion on the 996 working system in the public opinion field has been going on for some time, but it is still not over, and even "climax after climax" from time to time. This in itself is a puzzling phenomenon: why has an obviously illegal practice been standing, even entangled in the basic right and wrong issues? I’m afraid the reason lies in the related interests, so that the defenders of 996 refused to admit it even in the face of common sense recognized by most people.

　　Needless to say, the defenders of 996 have a strong lineup, among which there are some star entrepreneurs that our society most respects. Their arguments themselves have a strong personality color, and naturally have the star aura of the protagonist, so they are very confusing.

　　Moreover, some people are good at occupying the commanding heights of morality. For example, their core "rhetoric" is to link, bind and even uniquely equate 996 with struggle. In their discussion, 996 is illegal and unreasonable, which is nothing, as long as a "struggle" is enough: without struggle, where can there be a future? No, where did 996 come from? For the future, shouldn’t it be 996? For the future, it must be 996! Only 996!

　　In order to "consolidate" this logic, "winners" presented their own "selfless work" and moved out a large set of tall sayings and examples, even "two bombs and one star" were used to say things. They even stigmatized the legal 8-hour work as the opposite of 996. Those who work honestly for 8 hours just don’t work hard, struggle, seek stability, "have no future" and so on. This is a series of extremely confusing operations. It’s a pity that this logic is wrong from the beginning. This artificially set formula "996= Struggle" does not exist, and the resulting series of deductions are naturally just mistakes.

　　Struggle must be voluntary, supported by a sense of responsibility for the cause and confidence in the future. For 996, which is enforced by enterprises, if there is no system to implement the rigidity of the consistency of employees’ interests and enterprises’ interests, and there is no system to ensure that employees have a solid future, the struggle cannot exist. When employees lack the protection of long-term contracts, they will be laid off at any time, and there is no definite return to reward their sense of responsibility, even overtime pay. At this time, talking about struggle is tantamount to "why not eat meat?" At the end of the demographic dividend, forcing 996 is a double-edged sword. Squeezing employees by killing the goose that lays the golden eggs will inevitably overdraw the future and bring negative effects to the long-term development of enterprises.

　　I have to say that although this bowl of chicken soup carefully cooked by star entrepreneurs looks tall, it is obviously toxic and it is difficult for workers to laugh. What needs to be vigilant is that this kind of poisonous chicken soup argument is tantamount to deconstructing the spirit of struggle and the construction of a society ruled by law. It has been repeatedly brought out, which will interfere with the main theme of the times to carry forward the spirit of struggle and cause ideological confusion.

　　996 is not synonymous with struggle, it is more related to legal and interest issues. Advise people who are interested in promoting the normalization of 996: please honestly talk about the interests under the legal framework, don’t confuse the audience with so many lofty words, but actually come up with an interest protection system that allows workers to share joys and sorrows with enterprises. What we need is a legitimate and reasonable spirit of struggle, a spirit of dedication and responsibility to ourselves, our family and our country. If we separate these, the spirit of struggle will become passive water and a tree without roots.