Collecting service fees under the guise of collecting treasures, Chongqing police cracked a series of treasure fraud cases

  Recently, the police in Liangjiang New District of Chongqing City accurately attacked and detected a series of fraud cases with high "service fees" under the guise of "cultural relics" treasures, smashed five criminal dens, seized a large number of criminal tools such as computers, mobile phones, fake cultural relics and fake auction albums, and arrested 116 suspects, involving nearly 7 million yuan.

  It is reported that in late May this year, the police in Liangjiang New Area received an alarm from Mr. Li, a mass in the jurisdiction, saying that the staff of a cultural communication company in the jurisdiction took the initiative to contact the collection in their hands as "cultural relics", which was of great value. The staff of the company said that the company can arrange a trade fair or auction to auction the "cultural relics" in Mr. Li’s hand at a high price and invite Mr. Li to the company for an interview.

  So, Mr. Li came to the company with "baby" and was appraised by "experts". The market price exceeded one million yuan. Mr. Li hurriedly asked about the details of the exhibition auction, but the staff of the company told Mr. Li that the auction of "cultural relics" needed a certain process and related service fees were charged. If the auction was successful, the service fees would be refunded in full, but 8% of the auction amount would be charged as commission. Subsequently, Mr. Li signed a "service agreement on entrusted transaction of works of art" with the company, and paid a "service fee" of 66,000 yuan to the company at 10,000 yuan and 56,000 yuan respectively.

  After a period of time, Mr. Li found that the company had no qualification for treasure-making, and the so-called auction activities of the company were purely fictitious. The collection in his hand was identified by the relevant departments as old objects and had no collection value. After discovering that he was cheated, Mr. Li immediately reported the case to the police in Liangjiang New Area.

  Since then, the police in Liangjiang New Area have successively received such "Jianbao" fraud warnings, and the modus operandi is highly similar, and immediately set up a task force. After careful investigation, the police have mastered five collection trading companies named Jianbao in the jurisdiction and their personnel structures. The police found out that each of these five companies has a general manager and deputy general manager, an administrative department and a business department, and a sales team under the business department. Each group has 3 to 10 members, and the company has corresponding positions such as department manager and finance.

  On June 20, the police in Liangjiang New Area acted in a unified manner, attacked with precision and destroyed the fraud gang in one fell swoop.

  The police investigating the case said that the criminal gang recruited a group of ordinary employees who didn’t understand the identification and auction of cultural relics in the society. After the company’s unified training and exchange of words and fraud techniques, they invited customers to the company by telephone, and used the so-called "expert" appraisal and "appraiser" valuation to induce customers to auction their collections, and then signed an auction exhibition contract to collect "service fees".

  Xiong Moumou, the main suspect in the case, took the initiative to explain to the police that the company he opened was not a Jianbao company at all, and the company did not have any qualifications for cultural relics appraisal and auction. The so-called "cultural relics appraisal experts" and "price appraisers" were all "played" by insiders. The auction and exhibition are also a scam of the company’s "director", and it is impossible for the auction to succeed, just "going through the motions".

  Xiong Moumou also confessed that in order to better implement fraud, they will regularly give employees "vocational training" to teach relevant fraud operation procedures and words; At the same time, in order to hide the fraud, they will arrange the auction site abroad, so that customers can’t arrive at the scene in person. In addition, we will also make false invitations to the auction and shoot live videos of the auction and send them to customers to dispel their doubts and defraud their trust.

  At present, the case is under further investigation. (Reporter Zhan Haifeng correspondent Zhang Wei)

Chery Automobile in trunk-Jietu X95

Chery Automobile Jietu X95 2020 1.6T DCT Conquer Pro Edition 7 seats

Home of the car

Chery Automobile Jietu X95 2020 1.6T DCT Conquer Pro Edition 7 seats

    The storage space in the Jetway X95 car is abundant, and there are all conventional storage compartments. Even in the third row, two storage compartments are designed. After putting down the third row of seats, the storage space in the trunk is enough to meet the needs of ordinary families. However, there is also a small regret. When the third row of seats is opened, the trunk space is a little cramped. If you have children at home and want to put a stroller, you can only put down the third row of seats.

Excerpt from "When Consumption Returns to Rationality, Test the Quick Way X95 7-seat Edition"

British media: Biden said that his previous visit to Ireland was to "ensure that the British did not commit mischief."

  [Global Network Reporter Zhu Jiaqi] "Biden said that he had previously visited Ireland for ‘ Make sure that the British are not fooling around ’ 。” The British "Daily Telegraph" reported Biden’s latest criticism of Britain on this topic on the 11th. He warned the latter that if it really tore up the "Northern Ireland Protocol" with the EU, the United States might "forget" the Anglo-American Free Trade Agreement.

Biden met with Irish Prime Minister Valade during his visit to Ireland in April. Source: Foreign media

  It is reported that Biden’s criticism of Britain was made in a speech at the Democratic National Committee of new york on the evening of 10th. Biden said that his previous visit to Ireland was to "ensure that the British did not commit any mischief" and did not "betray" their commitment in the Northern Ireland Peace Agreement.

  According to the report, Biden and other Democrats believe that Britain’s "Brexit" is a threat to the peace process in Northern Ireland, because the latter may bring Ireland and Northern Ireland back to the land "hard border" situation again.

  According to media reports, the "Northern Ireland Protocol" is part of the British "Brexit" agreement. According to the agreement, Northern Ireland will remain in the European Single Market and the EU Customs Union to prevent the "hard border" on land in Ireland. However, some goods entering Northern Ireland from Great Britain are subject to customs and border security inspection. After signing the "Brexit" agreement, the British side constantly complained that the protocol was rigid, interfered with trade in Northern Ireland, aggravated political instability, and demanded amendments. Negotiations between Britain and Europe on amending the Protocol lasted for some time, and the relationship between the two sides was once tense.

  Northern Ireland has always been a special area of Britain with strong political instability. On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the signing of the Northern Ireland Peace Agreement, that is, in April this year, US President Biden arrived in Belfast, the capital of Northern Ireland, to start his visit to Britain and Ireland.

  According to previous reports, Biden also said before his visit that his primary task was to "maintain peace in Northern Ireland" and help ease his political paralysis. However, The Guardian believed at that time that Biden was unlikely to ease the deadlock by himself, and the "hard border" created by Brexit in Britain destroyed trust and balance. Although the Windsor Framework eased the situation, trust reconstruction would be a slow process.

  As for the "Windsor Framework", on February 27th this year, Britain and the European Union announced that they had reached the agreement, making new arrangements for the trade in Northern Ireland after Brexit. Although the framework was supported and affirmed by the political circles of Britain, Ireland, the European Union and the United States, it was not supported by democratic unionist party in Northern Ireland, who also refused to restart the parliament together with Sinn Fein and other parties. This political deadlock has not been broken so far.